The president of the Supreme Court (armed forces) of the Russian Federation published a report on judicial practices, explaining violations of the anti -monopoly law that could be given to administrative responsibilities, Kommersant's report.
Clause 7 of the document is clarified that “When assessing the presence of abuse in the acts of the dominant subject, the Court will take into account the legitimate interests of this topic, which any market participant has the right to persecute, regardless of its position in the commodity market.”
Armed Forces RF emphasized that in the case of market violations where some active entities, anti -monopoly agencies should consider their actions with each other and are not right when punishing those objects selectively.
In addition, in paragraph 9 of the document, the president of the armed forces of the Russian Federation clarified that the anti -monopoly agency must prove the existence of negative consequences is the result of business actions.
The document also refers to the abuse of business entities to their partners in the market and responsibilities. These cases are recorded for retail and retail.
Pay special attention to procedural moments and comply with procedural requirements. Clause 19 indicates that tax and banking agencies are not responsible for not cooperating by the exclusive anti -exclusive agency of documents and information containing banks or tax secrets.
For new terms, the RF armed forces have called their positions related to the management of organizations (criminal code) in the field of housing construction. The document clarifies that antagonistic ban and Islamic penalty fines may be applied to the Criminal Code in case such a criminal Code prevents the approach of operators on the common property of the House of Representatives.